Showing posts with label posthuman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label posthuman. Show all posts

Jan 27, 2013

In Defense of Incalculable: Big Data and the Un-dead Theorist

Quick comment written after reading Ian Steadman's 'Big data, language and the death of the theorist' in Wired UK [http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-01/25/big-data-end-of-theory]
A theorist can (and will) die, indeed, that is quite a probabble event. S/he can commit suicide as a result of a nervous breakdown, exhaustion, or loss of faith in something essentially humane. Theorist can also die in an accident caused by some crucial miscalculation. And death can be a calculable event as well——when it actually happens. But until then (when?) there is also a potential chance to make some incalculable reflections about this calculability.

It is the theorist who makes a resolution to understand The Data itself instead of competing with data crunching supercomputers. This concept of calculable realities, which is being propagated and exploited by the dominating contemporary techno-scientific discourse, was (and still is) tormenting many theorists. Wittgenstein was forced to make a paradigmic U turn after publishing his 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus' and renounce the idea of calculability. Godel used the language of calculation itself——mathematics——while trying to prove that the result of a correct calculation can be wrong and thus arrived at his famous theorem.

And there is another aspect of this 'big data crunching ideology': it encloses the discourse within itself by remaining mute about the philosophical problems surrounding some of the fundamental constitutive elements of a techno-scientific reality: 'thinking', 'intelligence', 'reality', 'self', 'representation', etc. Here the premise of incalculability, or 'outside calculability'——i.e., also, 'outside-the-text'——functions not as a reference to some self-sustained Being outside-the-text per se, but rather points to something which can be identified as a potentiality, a human 'spirit'.

To defend the incalculable would also mean to defend the faculty of reflection. The 'death of a theorist'——or, rather, termination of reflection by rendering it obsolete as a faculty——would signal that the text is finally able to reflect upon itself, that it has become conscious of itself.

Jul 7, 2012

Intelligence on Artificial Intelligence

As far as artificiality is concerned, the question of intelligence is not a philosophical question anymore; it's the question of technology.